In this article we have compiled the OKR definition and a compact introduction to the OKR method. This includes OKR values, OKR principles, OKR roles, OKR meetings, OKR artifacts, OKR tools and important OKR terms.
OKR is an acronym that stands for Objectives and Key Results.
If you are looking for an article that describes the definition of OKRs – examples of OKRs – then go to the article: OKR Examples.
The definition of OKR is not defined by any official organization.
Our definition of OKR is:
OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is an agile strategy execution method and modern goal-setting method. It helps to create focus, uniform alignment, coordination, commitment and transparency around ambitious, measurable goals.
The targets are normally set, tracked and reassessed on a quarterly basis. The OKR process also incorporates the perspective and creativity of each team. The aim is to ensure that everyone is moving in the same direction, with clear priorities, at a constant rhythm.
OKR is a management system for targeted and modern employee management. It is a framework for setting objectives and measuring key results.
(OKR definition – source: Wikipedia)
OKR is a collaborative goal setting tool used by teams and individuals to set challenging, ambitious goals with measurable outcomes. OKRs allow you to track progress, create alignment and drive commitment to measurable goals.
(OKR definition – source: whatmatters.com)
OKR […] is a […] tool to create alignment and commitment around measurable goals.
(OKR definition – source: felipecastro.com)
The OKR values are very well described by the acronym FACTS. It stands for focus, alignment, commitment, transparency and stretch goals:
We support you in the introduction of OKR, in OKR training and in optimizing the use of OKR in your company.
We support you in the introduction of OKR, in training and in optimizing the application in your company.
Erno Marius Obogeanu-Hempel and many other OKR Experts®
The OKR principles are not defined by any official organization.
Our idea of the OKR principles is:
These OKR principles also contribute to a certain extent to the OKR definition.
Here’s an example from John Doerr of an OKR set to spend more time away from the office and with family:
In our article OKR examples you will find many more examples for almost all departments of a company. You will also receive instructions on how to optimally define OKR in various departments.
When defining and implementing OKR, a number of things need to be taken into account. Things you should do are at least as important as things you shouldn’t do. You will therefore find a table here to help you define OKR sets:
Dos | Don'ts |
---|---|
Objectives und Key Results müssen innerhalb des Zyklus erreichbar ein | Objectives und Key Results setzen, die innerhalb des Zyklus unerreichbar sind und längern dauern – besser: in kleinere Ziele herunterbrechen. |
Klare Kommunikation der OKR-Sets. Alle OKR-Sets werden veröffentlicht. Den Start macht die Management-Ebene mit den Top-Level / Unternehmens OKR-Sets. | Nur den Top-Down Ansatz verfolgen – besser: Top-down, bottom-up und horizontal |
Ausrichtung, Abstimmung, Verantwortlichkeit und möglichst Autonomie | Key Results als Task formulieren – besser: messbare ergebnis-/wirkungsorientierte Metrik mit Zielwert. |
2 bis 4 OKR-Sets pro Ebene/Team und 2 bis 4 Key Results pro Objective | Zu viele Objectives setzen – besser: maximal 4 OKR-Sets pro Ebene/Team. |
Management by Objectives is the predecessor of OKR and was developed by Peter Drucker in the 1950s. The manager and employees agree on annual targets that are aligned with the company’s objectives.
Advantages of MbO:
Disadvantages of MbO:
Later, Andy Grove, CEO of Intel at the time, improved Management by Objectives and developed Intel Management by Objectives (iMbO) – and defined OKR.
Andy Grove introduced OKR at Intel, initially calling it iMbO (Intel Management by Objectives) and convinced his colleague John Doerr of the method, who later became investment manager for Google at venture capitalist Kleiner Perkins and introduced OKR there in 1999 – he became the most prominent evangelist of OKR after Andy Grove.
Larry Page from Google was so impressed by the model that he used it to manage Google. Larry Page attributes part of Google ‘s success to OKR.
Nowadays, many companies, including German ones, use OKR.
The OKR Framework is essentially based on the following key points:
The OKR cycle is iterated over and over again. The OKR cycle comprises various meetings. It begins with the planning phase and the OKR planning meetings.
During the execution phase, work is carried out on the actual target fulfillment. Both Daily Huddles and OKR Weekly Meetings are held for voting purposes. At the end of the OKR cycle, the OKR reviews and OKR retrospectives take place in the final phase.
OKR (Objectives and Key Results) and KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) are both management tools for measuring and controlling performance and progress, but they have different focuses and applications.
OKR is used to define corporate, departmental or team objectives and to measure progress and their achievement. An “Objective” is a clearly defined goal, a mini-vision to be achieved, and the “Key Results” are specific, quantifiable results that measure the progress of this goal and indicate the achievement of this goal. The OKR model is designed to set ambitious goals and find innovative ways to achieve them. It encourages risk-taking and creativity, and it is flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances.
KPI: KPI stands for Key Performance Indicator. These are specific, measurable metrics that are used to measure the performance and operational values of a company, department, team or system. KPIs are usually more focused on ongoing monitoring of performance and ensuring the consistency and quality of work performance and systems. They are used to monitor routine performance, operational activities and day-to-day business based on established standards and expectations.
In practice, many companies use both OKRs and KPIs, often in combination. OKRs can help to clarify strategic goals and priorities and focus on the important things, while KPIs can help to measure, monitor and track day-to-day performance – ensuring that the quality and consistency of work and systems is maintained.
Further information in the article: The OKR Method – Introduction to Objectives and Key Results